Back to Blog

Rapid Prototyping versus Traditional Development


When put into list format, the differences between Application Development VS Rapid Prototyping are very stark:

Traditional Application Design

  • Engineers and business development teams work on a bloated technical spec often 50-100 pages long that has very little value or meaning because it can’t be visually interpreted and doesn’t reflect the core experience of the product.
  • Programmers create an enormous database with little flexibility
  • Developers take months to put together choppy wireframes that will later drive the design/skinning process. As all designers know, programmers leading the design process is a dangerous idea.
  • Developers hand off template skinning duties to UI designers who have less flexibility than if they were starting from scratch and iterating on templates with the client.
  • Eventually the application launches and the design process feels like a quick & dirty effort to put “lipstick on the pig”

Rapid Prototyping Process

  • A designer interprets the clients’ ideas for the product goals and user experience, shaving out features that don’t make a real impact and focusing on the core value
  • The designer begins working immediately on Photoshop/Illustrator comps of high level pages such as Home, Registration, Account Dashboard and a set of style rules for Forms, Data Tables and Wizards
  • One approval is reached, the designer begins coding out high level pages and linking them together in XHTML/CSS.
  • All template pages are fleshed out in XHTML and can be easily modified, removed, added to or iterated upon.
  • Different states can be developed to show errors, blank states, populated states, etc.
  • Designers hand off templates to the client who then gets developers to respond visually and experientially.

Though the design process and programming process is reversed, sometimes it can still take a while to develop the application given the HTML templates, but several key benefits of doing the design first include:

  • Ability to get programmers to understand exactly what they’re providing.
  • Ability to show investors or early stage clients exactly how the app will look and work to raise money while in development.
  • Ability to provide user testing to get feedback and make any major necessary changes to prototype.

Author Alex Fedorov

Alex is a strategic thinker with a gift for information architecture, known for his ability to wireframe complex workflows and multiple states of applications at the speed of light. He is passionate about clean, data-driven design.

More posts from this author

Sign up to receive updates from our blog

What we do Expertise

From concept to design, we'll partner with your team to deliver amazing product and website experiences.

Recent Projects Work

See the results of our most recent digital product and website engagements.